Bruce Jenner is not a woman: Can we really not consider the materiality of things? If a cow thinks to be a bull, is it a bull or a cow? It's a cow who thinks to be a bull, but it's not a bull. To consider thoughts and feelings, "sensations", as juridically more important than material data would be the end of positivist western culture.
A woman is only the female of the human gender, it's not a thought, it's a physical condition, therefore there are FGM, pregnancies and miscarriages, as a woman I feel offended that People call Jenner a woman, it's not about equal pay, it's about this:
The female chromosome 's got a shape like XX while the male chromosome has got a shape like XY, transexuals don't fight against me or against Alex Jones or against the Pope; they fight against themselves. And ask the rest of humanity to lie. The real enemy is Freemasonry, the others, like Diane Sawyer are just sheeps. Freemasonry wants us to switch from our positivist culture to a sort of wicked version of hinduism where reality is an illusion and only thoughts count and want to impose it with smooth, false philanthropic issues, like trans cry if you don't tell them they are women or men according to their thoughts. This would be the end of the logic and scientific attitude towards reality, which is what brought the West to be so over-developed in comparison to the other parts of the world . But Freemasonry hates the West: they are the Great Orient, they call themselves like that.
Comments
Post a Comment